China should be sued for trillions in damages says top UK think tank

China should be sued for trillions in damages says top UK think tank

According to the report, Coronavirus Compensation? by conservative London think tank The Henry Jackson Society, China could be sued under 10 possible legal avenues, including the International Health Regulations, which were beefed up after the SARS outbreak, which China also tried to cover up.

The report said had China provided accurate information at an early juncture, “the infection would not have left China.”

China only reported the disease to the WHO on December 31 and said there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission.

Yet whistleblower medics, including Li Wenliang, were reprimanded for raising the alert. Some were confident the disease was spreading between humans before this date.

Reporting by the South China Morning Post has cited Chinese government documents that identified nearly 200 cases of coronavirus by December 27.

The International Health Regulations says nations must monitor and share data related to the spread, severity, and transmission of any pathogens that are potentially transmissible internationally.

The Henry Jackson Society said China had done the opposite, by covering up data and punishing doctors who sought to tell the truth.

It urged a coalition of countries to launch joint-action because of China’s record of “responding aggressively to threats on the world stage.”

“Taking action would require both courage and global solidarity,” the report said.

“In its early response, Wuhan and Hubei breached [International Health] Regulations…responsibility goes to the top of the regime.


“It appears more than probable that the Chinese Communist Party’s response to COVID-19 was in breach of international law,” it said.

The report said that while levelling a claim of dispute under the International Health Regulations would be unprecedented, there was an initial framework within the structures of the WHO for bringing such a suit.

Other options could involve using the International Court of Justice and Permanent Court of Arbitration, The World Trade Organisation, bilateral investment treaties and even the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Domestic courts and Chinese courts could also be possible avenues, the report said.


Report co-author Matthew Henderson said the Chinese people were also the victims of their government’s negligence.

“They are innocent victims, like the rest of us. This is the fault of the CCP,” he said.

“The Chinese Communist Party has learnt no lessons from its failure in the SARS epidemic.

“Their repeated blunders, lies and disinformation, from the start of the COVID-19 epidemic, have already had far more deadly consequences.

“By computing the cost of damage caused to advanced economies and assembling a series of possible legal processes to which the rules-based order can have recourse, we offer a sense of how the free world might seek recompense for the appalling harm the CCP has done,” he said.

Most Viewed in World


Source link

get a room cheap

saving people money in the travel industry for decades.

Leave a Reply

Close Menu